Friday, May 10, 2019

Global Leadership and Managment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Global Leadership and Managment - Essay ExampleKeywords global, Nokia, corporate social responsibility, stakeholders. Global Leadership and forethought Nokia has always been one of the leaders of the global telecommunications industry. Nokias mobile gadgets are used and loved by millions of consumers around the world. The quality and efficiency of Nokias strategies cannot be overestimated. However, the corporation is not always sensitive to the ineluctably and concerns of its employees and stakeholders. At the heart of this discussion is Nokias decision to instill its output facilities from Germany to Romania. Of the biggest concern is the fact that German facilities have been extremely profitable, and Nokias striving to cut its costs by all possible center subjects thousands of employees to the risks of unemployment and poverty. The goal of this paper is to review the strategies used by Nokia in its movement to the top of the business power structure and to analyze the pros an d cons of Nokias approaches to global expansion and growth. Until 2008, Nokia had been the biggest global manufacturer of cell phones (Jain, 2009). Based in Finland, Nokia bit by bit turned into the leading provider of cell phone devices and applications in the global telecommunications industry. ... A decision was make to close the dress in Germany and move production facilities to Romania (Jain, 2009). Nokia believed that cost reductions was a necessity and would help the federation to retain its profitable position in the global telecommunications industry (Jain, 2009). Reasons why Nokia decided to move its production facilities from Germany to Romania were simple and obvious employees in Germany were paid ten times as much as employees in Romania would need to fulfill the same amount of work (Jain, 2009). Moreover, the creation of a new plant in Romania was part of Nokias low-cost strategy (Jain, 2009). At that time, the company ran a number of manufacturing facilities in eu ropium (namely, Hungary, Finland and Germany), a manufacturing plant in Britain, as well as in Africa and the Middle East (Jain, 2009). The plant in Germany added to the burden of costs carried by Nokia in Europe, and the company management felt that moving to Romania was the better(p) way to stay competitive in the long run. The decision to move the production facilities from Germany to Romania stirred good deal protests, and the wave of backlash resulting from employee opposition soon expanded to cover European consumers of Nokia (Jain, 2009). Employees disagreed with Nokias decision to move the plant to Romania, mainly because Nokias presence in Germany had been extremely profitable for the entire business (Jain, 2009). sweat unions in Germany called Nokias strategic plans unacceptable and inhuman (Jain, 2009). In the meantime, Nokia believed that the German plant would reduce the companys global competitiveness (Jain, 2009). The plant accounted for more than

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.